DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009162522-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-08

000120018

Contested design: 009162522-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009162522-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Feng Hongvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

103 New House Farm Drive, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2FW United Kingdom

Represented by

Harrison IP SAS

Anne Yves Lacaze-Masmonteil

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Pudatong Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd

China (CN)

B20, Rm.2319, No.316, Huanshi Middle Rd., Yuexiu Dist., Guangzhou, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

ELSA & ANNA Princess Costumes for Girls fancy dress

https://amazon.fr (ASIN B01 6NM FKE4) · Amazon.fr

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and, alternatively, individual character, relying on an Amazon listing and related invoices for a fancy dress disclosed before filing.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not rebut disclosure, the evidential reliability of the invoices, or the comparison of the designs.
  • The Division found the Amazon printout and invoices mutually corroborative, with the same product name, ASIN, and pre-filing transactions sufficient to prove disclosure under Article 7.
  • Minor differences in cape presentation and colour shade did not alter the same overall impression on the informed user, so the design was invalidated and costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028