DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004156909-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-19

000119067

Contested design: 004156909-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 004156909-0006 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

HSM Schuhmarketing GmbH

Germany (DE)

Werksstr. 15, 45527 Hattingen, Deutschland

Represented by

Marc Barth

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

shoes

RCD No 002396457-0028 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-02-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCD D1 covering shoes.
  • The holder argued the contested clog created a different overall impression, citing differences in openings, strap, edging, sole and an allegedly crowded market.
  • The Division found D1 had been validly disclosed before the filing date and treated the informed user as a consumer familiar with clogs and able to compare them directly.
  • It held the shared overall shape, cut-out heel, upper holes, edge trim, strap and round rivet outweighed the cited differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the design was declared invalid in full, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028