DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008148738-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-27

000120880

Contested design: 008148738-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design 008148738-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hi-Tech Automotive (Pty) Ltdvia PDF extraction

ZA

106 Park Drive St Georges, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape 60001, South Africa

Represented by

Lewis Silkin Ireland

Holder · RCD owner

AC Cars Ltd

CY

Maria House, Avlonos Street, 1075 Nicosia, Cyprus

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDExhibit NP14

Vehicle bodywork

Community design registration No 000863097-0002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-03-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested car design lacked novelty and individual character because the earlier Ace vehicle was already public and the contested design corresponded to it.
  • The applicant relied in particular on a witness statement and Exhibit NP14, a copy of prior Community design registration No 000863097-0002 for vehicle bodywork.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the Division assessed the case first under individual character and accepted publication of the prior RCD in the Community Designs Bulletin as disclosure.
  • The Division found the contested design almost identical to the prior design, with only minor accessory or color differences, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128