DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008470249-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-01

000121118

Contested design: 008470249-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 008470249-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008470249-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Plan M GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Viktoriastr. 26-28, 45468 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Göran Packwitz

Germany (DE)

Nordersteinstr. 32, 27474 Cuxhaven, Deutschland

Represented by

Claus Simandi

Prior art cited (2)

PublicationA2⚠ rejected as evidence

Electronic instruction manual for the 'E-Roller UCARVER' showing a foldable electric scooter in aluminium and carbon versions

disclosed 2014-09-09

Web disclosureA3

Issuu product sheet for the 'UCARVER' electric scooter showing the same older designs

https://issuu.com/researchtub/docs/mi_produktfolder_datenblatt_ucarver · issuu.com · disclosed 2015-06-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested electric scooter design lacked novelty and individual character because it reproduced earlier disclosed UCARVER electric scooter designs.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Issuu product-sheet screenshots, read with the manual, as proof that the earlier UCARVER design had been publicly disclosed by 2 June 2015.
  • Comparing the designs from the perspective of the informed user, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128