DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002735274-0014

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-03

000119178

Contested design: 002735274-0014

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 002735274-0014 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, Vereinigte Staaten

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

HSM Schuhmarketing GmbH

Germany (DE)

Werksstr. 15, 45527 Hattingen, Deutschland

Represented by

Marc Barth

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

clog footwear

RCD No 001754854-0001 · EUIPO eSearch database · disclosed 2010-09-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCD No 001754854-0001, relying on EUIPO eSearch extracts showing its prior publication.
  • The holder argued the contested clog created a different overall impression, invoked decision ICD 115 929, and said design freedom for clogs was limited.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been disclosed, the informed user was a clog user, design freedom remained relatively high, and alleged market saturation was unproven.
  • Because the shared overall appearance outweighed the identified differences, the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid, with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028