Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-08
000120858
Contested design: 008129506-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design 008129506-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Hi-Tech Automotive (Pty) Ltdvia PDF extraction
ZA
106 Park Drive St Georges, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape 60001, South Africa
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
AC Cars Ltd
CY
Maria House, Avlonos Street, 1075 Nicosia, Cyprus
Prior art cited (1)
car / vehicle bodywork (Cobra MkII prior design)
Community design registration No 000863097-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-03-28
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued that the contested car design lacked novelty and individual character because the Cobra MkII design had been publicly available since the 1960s and matched the contested design.
- ›The applicant relied, among other evidence, on prior Community design registration No 000863097-0003 published in 2008; the holder filed no observations.
- ›The Division accepted publication of the prior RCD in the Community Designs Bulletin as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
- ›It found the contested design almost identical to the prior design and held that the minor differences in tyre walls, colour, steering-wheel side, and rear views did not alter the overall impression.
- ›The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
- MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
- MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000124336 vs Radosław Pryba | 2026-05-27 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129075 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129077 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000128979 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129039 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129055 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129038 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000129076 vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |