DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008916910-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-25

000118962

Contested design: 008916910-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 008916910-0002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield, Colorado 80020, United States

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Kondor Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Sw. Teresy 91a, 91341 Lodz Poland

Represented by

EUPATENT.PL

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureExhibit 2

'Femmes Chaussure' by Sabots clogs

ASIN B01F7Q35E4 · Amazon.fr · disclosed 2016-05-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on Amazon.fr evidence of earlier 'Femmes Chaussure' by Sabots clogs disclosed before the filing date.
  • Holder challenged the clarity, quality, and disclosure value of the web evidence and argued design freedom for clogs was limited, so the cited differences changed the overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon disclosure as sufficiently identified and dated, and found the compared views adequate for assessing the prior design.
  • It held the similarities in shape, perforations, strap arrangement, and floral decoration outweighed minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028