DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003232404-0112

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-09-14

000119059

Contested design: 003232404-0112

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the proprietor is ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Declares registered Community design No 003232404-0112 to be invalid. 3. Orders the proprietor to bear the costs, which are fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kaufhaus Martin Stolz GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Markt 2-6, 23769 Fehmarn OT Burg, Germany

Represented by

Maiwald GmbH

Holder · RCD owner

Naketano GmbH

Germany (DE)

Alfredstraße 57-65, 45130 Essen, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Naketano "Darth III" hooded sweatshirt / pullover

ASIN B00F3KWCPI; https://www.amazon.de/Naketano-Darth-III-W-Hoodie/dp/B00E2PRP98 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2014-01-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on the earlier "Darth III" hoodie disclosed on Amazon.de from 17 January 2014.
  • The proprietor disputed disclosure, invoked the Article 7(2) grace period for some earlier designs, and argued the contested design was novel and had individual character.
  • The Division accepted D1 as publicly disclosed before filing, found no relevant restriction on designer freedom, and held that the shared hoodie features dominated the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1)(b); the contested design was declared invalid and the proprietor was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila beans
  • MemberALVARO SOCMERINO
  • MemberWolfgang Schramek

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028