DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008132419-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-09-18

000120878

Contested design: 008132419-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design 008132419-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hi-Tech Automotive (Pty) Ltdvia PDF extraction

ZA

106 Park Drive St Georges, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape 60001, South Africa

Represented by

Lewis Silkin Ireland

Holder · RCD owner

AC Cars Ltd

CY

Maria House, Avlonos Street, 1075 Nicosia, Cyprus

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDNP13

Vehicle bodywork / Cobra MkIV car design

RCD No 000863097-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-03-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested car design lacked novelty and individual character in light of the earlier Cobra MkIV design disclosed before the grace period.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Invalidity Division found the earlier RCD was validly disclosed through its 28/03/2008 publication and treated designer freedom for cars as at least average.
  • The contested design was almost identical to the prior design, and the minor differences in roll bars, fuel cap, rear fender cover and trim did not change the overall impression.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128