DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008734388-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-09-19

000118963

Contested design: 008734388-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No 008734388-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 008734388-0001 è dichiarato nullo. 3. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

F. Lorenzi Living AGvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Rebbergstrasse 32, 8102 Oberengstringen, Svizzera

Holder · RCD owner

Artisansvia PDF extraction

GR

12A Kyprou Str., 18346, Moschato, Grecia

Represented by

Serena Cipolletti

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAllegato 6

'Saint Tropez Sky Blue Flats' sandal model shown in archived website screenshots

https://desienashoes.shop · Internet Archive / desienashoes.shop · disclosed 2021-04-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested sandal copied its earlier Resort collection models.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, invoked alleged misuse of public-interest geographic signs, and argued wording and functional constraints created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted Annex 6 from Internet Archive as proof of prior disclosure before the filing date and found the designer's freedom in women's sandals remained high.
  • Comparing the earlier Saint Tropez model with the contested design, the Division found no different overall impression for the informed user and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028