DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008734388-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-09-19

000119000

Contested design: 008734388-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 008734388-0005 è dichiarato nullo. 3. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

F. Lorenzi Living AGvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Rebbergstrasse 32, 8102 Oberengstringen, Svizzera

Holder · RCD owner

Artisansvia PDF extraction

GR

12A Kyprou Str., 18346, Moschato, Grecia

Represented by

Serena Cipolletti

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAllegato 6

Capri Tobacco Flats sandal model shown in Internet Archive screenshots

https://desienashoes.shop · Internet Archive · disclosed 2021-06-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Resort sandal models, especially the Capri Tobacco Flats disclosure archived on 2021-06-19.
  • Holder argued the locality names should be disregarded, disclosure was unproven, design freedom was narrow, and the wording and sole markings created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive evidence, treated the informed user as a purchaser of women’s sandals, and found a high degree of designer freedom despite ergonomic constraints.
  • Because the contested sandal created the same overall impression as the earlier model, the RCD was declared invalid and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028