DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008734388-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-09-19

000119002

Contested design: 008734388-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 008734388-0009 è dichiarato nullo. 3. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

F. Lorenzi Living AGvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Rebbergstrasse 32, 8102 Oberengstringen, Svizzera

Holder · RCD owner

Artisansvia PDF extraction

GR

12A Kyprou Str., 18346, Moschato, Grecia

Represented by

Serena Cipolletti

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAllegato 6

Saint Tropez Sky Blue Flats sandals

https://desienashoes.shop · Internet Archive / desienashoes.shop · disclosed 2021-04-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Resort collection sandals, especially the archived Saint Tropez Sky Blue Flats web disclosure.
  • Holder disputed disclosure, argued some earlier models unlawfully used Italian place names, and maintained that the different wording and insole details produced a different overall impression.
  • The Division rejected the preliminary request to exclude certain earlier models and accepted the Internet Archive material as sufficient proof of disclosure before the filing date.
  • It found substantial designer freedom for women’s sandals and concluded the contested design created the same overall impression as the earlier Saint Tropez model.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was invalidated, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028