DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003343862-0030

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-09-21

000119061

Contested design: 003343862-0030

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design No. 003343862-0030 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 003343862-0030 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kaufhaus Martin Stolz GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Markt 2-6, 23769 Fehmarn OT Burg, Deutschland

Represented by

Maiwald GmbH

Holder · RCD owner

Naketano GmbH

Germany (DE)

Alfredstraße 57-65, 45130 Essen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Model Body Murat hoodie / pullover

ASIN B00PFUSK2A; https://www.amazon.de/Naketano-Herren-Hoodie/dp/B00PFUWU7G · Amazon.de · disclosed 2014-11-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on earlier design D1 for a hoodie/pullover.
  • The holder disputed disclosure of the earlier designs, invoked the grace period for some self-disclosures, and argued the contested design remained new and had individual character.
  • The Division found D1 had been validly disclosed on Amazon.de before the filing date and treated internet publication as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1).
  • Comparing the hoodie designs, the Division held that numerous shared features dominated the overall impression and the differences in collar shape and anchor decoration were insufficient.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028