DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003232404-0126

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-09-21

000119062

Contested design: 003232404-0126

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the proprietor must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Declares registered Community design No 003232404-0126 to be invalid. 3. Orders the proprietor to bear the costs, which are fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kaufhaus Martin Stolz GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Markt 2-6, 23769 Fehmarn OT Burg, Germany

Represented by

Maiwald GmbH

Holder · RCD owner

Naketano GmbH

Germany (DE)

Alfredstraße 57-65, 45130 Essen, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

"Brazzo" hooded sweatshirt / jacket model

ASIN B00NWED3QY; https://www.amazon.de/Naketano-Damen-Kapuzenjacke-Brazzo-Hoodie/dp/B00NWED3QY · amazon.de · disclosed 2014-05-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested hoodie design lacked novelty or individual character in light of earlier disclosed designs, relying in particular on model D1 "Brazzo" shown on Amazon.
  • The proprietor disputed proof of disclosure, invoked the Article 7(2) grace period for some earlier designs, and maintained that the contested design was novel and had individual character.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as proving disclosure of D1 on 13 May 2014 and, for procedural economy, examined individual character only against D1.
  • It found that the shared cut, hood, cords, pockets, patches, and emblem details dominated the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and had to be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila beans
  • MemberALVARO SOCMERINO
  • MemberWolfgang Schramek

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028