DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003759737-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-04

000119063

Contested design: 003759737-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 003759737-0009 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 003759737-0009 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kaufhaus Martin Stolz GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Markt 2-6, 23769 Fehmarn OT Burg, Deutschland

Represented by

Maiwald GmbH

Holder · RCD owner

Naketano GmbH

Germany (DE)

Alfredstraße 57-65, 45130 Essen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

hooded sweatshirt / pullover model Vasco II

https://www.facebook.com/Bluetomato/photos/a.82482971897/10151881757841898/- · Facebook / Blue Tomato · disclosed 2014-02-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier disclosed designs, relying in particular on D1, a Facebook disclosure of the Vasco II model dated 18 February 2014.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, invoked the grace period for some earlier designs, and argued that the contested design remained new and had individual character.
  • The Division found D1 had been validly disclosed to the relevant circles through Facebook and treated further prior art as unnecessary for deciding the case.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested hooded sweatshirt design, the Division found only minor differences and an almost identical overall impression for the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028