DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004759462-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-17

000119480

Contested design: 004759462-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 004759462-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

TecTake GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Tauberweg 41, 97999 Igersheim Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Qingdao zhengtao tool co.,Ltd.

China (CN)

Xia village, Zhangjialou town, Huangdao District, Shandong Province,, Qingdao City, 266000 China

Represented by

Raffay & Fleck

Prior art cited (2)

OtherAnnex 4ip.01

earlier identical handcart design invoked for novelty

Web disclosureAnnex 4ip.02

FUXTEC FX-CT700 foldable handcart

Amazon.de ASIN B07 42J NDW1 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-07-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier handcart disclosures including an Amazon listing for the FUXTEC FX-CT700.
  • The holder argued the handcarts differed in wheel design, spoke count, pocket layout, rear rod and buckles, and said a crowded prior-design landscape limited designer freedom.
  • The Division found the Amazon listing proved disclosure before the 15 March 2018 filing date and held the holder had not shown a saturated state of the art for handcarts.
  • Comparing the designs overall, the Division held the shared structure, frame, canopy, basket and handle arrangement outweighed the minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128