DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009009780-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-12-12

000120872

Contested design: 009009780-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of RCD No 009009780-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 009009780-0001 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese della titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Cris Conf. S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Strada Comunale di Fornio, 132, 43036 Fidenza (PR) Italia

Holder · RCD owner

Passaggio Obbligato S.p.A.

Italy (IT)

Piazza Cavour 3, Milano Italia

Prior art cited (2)

Trade mark

figurative mark 'Corona con Uccellini'

Italian trademark No 302017000128845 · Italy · disclosed 2018-08-23

Trade mark

figurative mark 'Corona con Uccellini e Dicitura PINKO'

International trademark designating the European Union No 1419699 · WIPO / European Union designation · disclosed 2018-02-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(b)Article 9(2)(c)Article 10(2)(b)Article 10(2)(c)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(e) CDR based on earlier Italian and international figurative trademarks allegedly used in the contested belt-buckle design.
  • The holder argued that only a weak circular ring is shared, while the earlier marks depict two birds and the contested design depicts a butterfly, excluding similarity and confusion.
  • The Division found the goods identical but the ring weakly distinctive, the signs only weakly visually similar, not comparable phonetically, and conceptually dissimilar.
  • The applicant's evidence did not prove enhanced distinctiveness or reputation of the earlier marks in the relevant territories.
  • The invalidity application was rejected because the applicant failed to show a confusingly similar or reputed earlier mark that could prohibit use in the contested design.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123314

vs XINMING SHOES MATERIAL CO.LTD

2025-12-23Art 25(1)(e)027
000129160

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2026-03-17025
000127175

vs GANNI A/S

2025-12-22025
000128199

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2025-11-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)025
000128156

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2025-11-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)025
000126217

vs NAVIMA CALZADOS, S.L.

2025-08-04025
000125895

vs Autumnpaper Limited

2025-07-22025
000123217

vs CM LAUFSTEG MÜNCHEN INTERNATIONAL BRANDS GmbH

2024-12-17025