DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000257001-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-01-22

000120118

Contested design: 000257001-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0002570010001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gor Factory, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Ctra. de Santomera- Albanilla Km. 8,800, Nave 2, 30620 Fortuna (Murcia) Spain

Represented by

Garrigues IP, s.l.p

Holder · RCD owner

Crocs, Inc.

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield, Colorado 80020, United States

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

red clog shown on the Holey Soles website

http://holeysoles.com · Internet Archive / holeysoles.com · disclosed 2003-04-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on archived Holey Soles webpages showing an earlier clog design.
  • The holder argued the applicant had not clearly compared the designs and that the contested clog created a different overall impression, especially because it included a heel strap.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive evidence as prior disclosure, found a high degree of design freedom for clogs, and held that the heel strap was the only notable difference.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character over D1, and the holder was ordered to bear the costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028