DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009183056-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-23

000123835

Contested design: 009183056-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009183056-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Maximilian Stückertvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Am Dürrbach 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Affargo LTDvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

27, Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Bezox Cuticle Cutter nail clipper shown on Amazon

ASIN B07FNM63DP · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2018-07-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested nail-clipper design lacked novelty and individual character because the same design had already been disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as a public internet disclosure from 24 July 2018 and treated the clearer duplicate image as usable for comparison.
  • It found the designs created the same overall impression; differences in screws versus rivets and the BEZOX mark were insignificant for individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288