Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-13
000122436
Contested design: 008795306-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay EUR 750 in costs.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008795306-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Activeshop Sp. Z o.o.via PDF extraction
Poland (PL)
Graniczna 8B DC2A, 54-610 Wrocław, Poland
Represented by
Agnieszka Byra
Holder · RCD owner
Piotr Malinowski
Poland (PL)
ul. Piotrkowska 270, 90-361 Łódź, Poland
Represented by
Maria Przybylska-Karczemska
Prior art cited (1)
'Lampa Do Paznokci 150W Sun X5 MAX GS-9' nail lamp auction listing
https://archiwum.allegro.pl · Allegro online Archive · disclosed 2020-07-21
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an Allegro archive listing for the earlier 'Lampa Do Paznokci 150W Sun X5 MAX GS-9' nail lamp.
- ›Holders disputed disclosure and argued limited design freedom and visible differences in shape, folds, controls, inscriptions, and proportions created a different overall impression.
- ›The Division accepted the Allegro archive as sufficient internet disclosure before 12 December 2021 and found the relevant features of the earlier design clearly visible.
- ›Taking average designer freedom into account, the Division held the shared overall shape, arrangement, display, buttons, and proportions outweighed minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
- ›The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holders were ordered to bear costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
- MemberChiara BORACE
- MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000130164 vs Moritz Neugebauer | 2026-05-22 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 8 |
| 000129241 vs Yi Wing Global Limited | 2026-05-12 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 8 |
| 000132044 vs Xucan XU | 2026-05-08 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 8 |
| 000131244 vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-27 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 8 |
| 000130964 vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-02-06 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 8 |
| 000130541 vs Medintim SL | 2025-12-23 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 8 |
| 000128396 vs Koninklijke Philips N.V. | 2025-12-15 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 8 |
| 000128638 vs Xiaoyan Kang | 2025-12-10 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 8 |