DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008823033-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-13

000122458

Contested design: 008823033-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008823033-0006 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Activeshop Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Graniczna 8B DC2A, 54-610 Wrocław, Poland

Represented by

Agnieszka Byra

Holder · RCD owner

Piotr Malinowski

Poland (PL)

ul. Piotrkowska 270, 90-361 Łódź Poland

Represented by

Maria Przybylska-Karczemska

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

cutter round cylinder for nail milling machines

https://archiwum.allegro.pl · Allegro online Archive · disclosed 2018-07-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier ceramic roller cutter disclosed in an Allegro auction archive before the filing date.
  • Holders argued the online disclosure was insufficient and that differences in length, proportions, pin, and pattern created a different overall impression in a constrained design field.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Allegro archive as proof of public disclosure and found the relevant features visible enough for comparison under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It held the designer's freedom was at least average and that similarities dominated, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberRebecca Julia SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288