DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008840284-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-27

000122456

Contested design: 008840284-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008840284-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Activeshop Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Graniczna 8B DC2A, 54-610 Wrocław, Poland

Represented by

Agnieszka Byra

Holder · RCD owner

Mollylac Michał Szewczykvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Piotrkowska 270, 90-361 Łódź, Poland

Represented by

Maria Przybylska-Karczemska

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

nail dryers

RCD No 008000731-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2020-06-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested nail dryer design differed from prior RCD No 008000731-0001 only in colour and lacked individual character.
  • Holder argued differences in colour, width, proportions, component positioning and the framed display created a different overall impression despite limited design freedom.
  • The Division found the prior RCD was validly disclosed through its Community Designs Bulletin publication before the contested filing date.
  • The Division considered designer freedom at least average and held the shared shape, proportions and arrangement outweighed minor decorative and colour differences.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288