DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008532683-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-27

000122675

Contested design: 008532683-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 008532683-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 008532683-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yongkang Yunyue Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

The second room from the east, Floor 2, No. 22, Weitai Road, Zhiying Town, Yongkang City, Jinhua City, Zhejiang 321300, China

Holder · RCD owner

Fuel Americas Incvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

1521 Concord Pike, Ste. 301, Wilmington, New Castle, US., Wilmington 19803, United States

Represented by

Xavier Przyborowski

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

golf buggy

CN 306174432 S (patent application No 202030383850.0) · CNIPA · disclosed 2020-11-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on Chinese design patent D1 published before the contested design’s filing date.
  • Holder argued D1 should be excluded under Article 7(2) CDR because the same business circle and designer stood behind both designs, and it also pointed to several visual differences.
  • The Division admitted late Exhibit 11 but found no reliable evidence that the holder or designer was successor in title to D1, so the Article 7(2) exception did not apply.
  • Comparing the golf buggy designs, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression on the informed user; the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.13

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128