DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024309-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-15

000124835

Contested design: 015024309-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015024309-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Weiquan Caivia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 102, No. 132 Shangludi Village, Qianshui Town, Wuchuan City, Guangdong Province China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Weibo Yuanvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm 1403, Duty Free Biz Bldg, No. 6, Fuhua 1st Rd,Futian district,, Shenzhen 518046 China

Represented by

Asternery S.L

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for 'Winwild Angel Wings with Halo' fancy dress costume wings

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0BNTVCP58 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2022-12-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on an Amazon disclosure of black fancy-dress wings before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations on the invalidity application or the cited prior design.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as proof of public disclosure under Article 7(1) and found the prior and contested wing designs produced the same overall impression.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), so the invalidity application was upheld and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028