DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015014964-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-08-14

000125176

Contested design: 015014964-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; registered Community design No 015014964-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder bears costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el modelo comunitario registrado n.º 015014964-0001. 3. Las costas sufragadas por la titular, fijadas en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

TAPEDESIGN WO GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Friedrich-Schnideritsch-Straße 2, 8054 Graz, Austria

Represented by

Stefan Lausegger

Holder · RCD owner

Yiwu Kaiding Socks Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Floor 5, Edificio 3, Wangdao Road, Beiyuan Street, Yiwu, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

sock design shown in Facebook and Instagram posts

Facebook account 'FS Footballcalcks' and Instagram account 'FS Footballsocks.de' · disclosed 2021-08-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested sock design lacked novelty because an identical sock design had already been disclosed online before filing, relying on Facebook and Instagram screenshots dated in 2021.
  • Holder did not submit any observations despite being invited to respond to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the social-media posts as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the earlier and contested sock designs identical, with no material colour difference because the contested design was registered in greyscale.
  • Application upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5(1)(b) CDR; the Division did not need to examine the alternative grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028