DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015012608-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-08-29

000125400

Contested design: 015012608-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 350 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0150126080001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lac SRLvia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Luigi carluccio 13, 73100 Lecce, Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Affargo LTDvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

27, Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

BEAKEY Triangolo Powder Puff

https://www.amazon.it (product identification No B0BRK9NHJW) · Amazon.it

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing the powder puff design had been disclosed on Amazon.it more than one year before filing.
  • The holder, although invited to respond, filed no observations or evidence contesting disclosure or novelty.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon screenshots as sufficient internet disclosure evidence and found the prior design publicly available before the filing date.
  • Comparing the shapes, ribbon placement, surface, and colour, the Division found the designs identical and the contested design not new.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288