DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008651806-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-06

000122174

Contested design: 008651806-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0086518060001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Out of the blue KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Beim neuen Damm 28, 28865 Lilienthal, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Yifeng Hevia PDF extraction

China (CN)

102A, Block 4, Xiangqi Garden, Shahe, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518053, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

BEZOX 2-in-1 Nano Glass Callus Remover foot file

ASIN B0829PLSFX · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-12-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested foot-file design lacked novelty and individual character because an identical earlier design had been disclosed online before filing.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon.de listing for the BEZOX 2-in-1 Nano Glass Callus Remover, available since 9 December 2020; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found only minor possible differences in unshown side details, abrasive surface, length, and finish.
  • It held that those differences did not alter the overall impression of a smooth, rounded, elongated foot file, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288