DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001456859-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-28

000126164

Contested design: 001456859-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 001456859-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Li Zhuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm. 101, Bldg. A, Xinmusheng Low Carbon Ind. Park, No. 6 Xinmu Ave., Xinmu Community, Pinghu St., Longgang Dist., Shenzhen China

Represented by

Ipside

Holder · RCD owner

ZBT International Trading GmbH

Germany (DE)

Halstenbeker Weg 98C, 25462 Rellingen, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

National design

electric oral hygiene apparatus

CN 303162141 S · Chinese design patent publication · disclosed 2015-04-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested electric oral hygiene apparatus lacked novelty or at least individual character over an earlier Chinese design patent published before filing.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, the comparison, or the applicant's assessment of the designer's freedom.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of Chinese design patent CN 303162141 S under Article 7 and treated the designer's freedom as at least average.
  • It found the designs identical in shape, with only color differences that did not alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld; the contested design was declared invalid and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288