DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008837884-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-29

000124375

Contested design: 008837884-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008837884-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KCT GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Robert-Bosch-Str. 30, 72348 Rosenfeld, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Radosław Pryba

Poland (PL)

Kolejowa 15, 67-300 Szprotawa, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog

Prior profile HP03672 used in the applicant's KCT insect screen and roller blind system ISR.

Product Catalogue 2013, page 32 · Applicant Product Catalogue 2013

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on its earlier HP03672 profile sold since 2006 and shown in its 2013 catalogue and other evidence.
  • The holder disputed disclosure and argued the compared profiles differed in shape, proportions, structure, and visible features, with similarities confined to technically functional or non-visible parts.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted disclosure of the prior design, especially through the 2013 catalogue corroborated by other evidence, and found the informed user would perceive very similar overall shapes.
  • Given at least average design freedom, the identified differences did not alter the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128