DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015002573-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-02-06

000124084

Contested design: 015002573-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 015002573-0005 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 015002573-0005 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Design e More S.A.via PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua das Casas Queimadas, nº 567 Grijó, 4415-439 Grijó - Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal

Holder · RCD owner

But Fashion Solutions S.A.

Portugal (PT)

Estrada Nacional nr3, 2380 Alcanena, Portugal

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

boots

RCD No 004594802-0005 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-01-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on earlier RCD No 004594802-0005 for boots.
  • The holder argued its boot design had a distinct overall impression and invoked its earlier Misty110 and DUSK models to challenge the applicant's position.
  • The Division held the applicant's earlier RCD was validly disclosed by publication and found the holder's evidence about other models irrelevant to this invalidity comparison.
  • Given broad design freedom, the shared boot shape and identical crisscross ribbon arrangement dominated minor sole differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028