DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015022842-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-03-03

000127200

Contested design: 015022842-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015022842-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Chen Ruivia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 59, Group 1, Jianshan Village, Wanggang Town, Xishui County, Hubei Province, China

Represented by

H&A

Holder · RCD owner

Affargo Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

27, Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3ax United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

beauty parlour equipment

Community design registration No 8567481-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2021-06-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested facial massager lacked novelty and individual character because earlier designs shared its key features.
  • To support invalidity, the applicant relied on Community design registration No 8567481-0001 published on 10/06/2021.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier registered design was properly disclosed and that both designs were identical apart from an immaterial shade difference.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b) CDR, so the design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288