DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008917355-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-06

000129521

Contested design: 008917355-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 008917355-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shaoguan Fengsui Network Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shaoguan, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Chenyi Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

bicycle grip offered on Amazon

ASIN B09C3N4R2P · amazon.de · disclosed 2021-10-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing broad design freedom and relying on earlier online-disclosed bicycle grip designs.
  • The applicant submitted an Amazon.de printout showing a bicycle grip identified by ASIN B09C3N4R2P offered since 24 October 2021.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) EUDR and found at least average designer freedom for handlebar grips.
  • Because the prior and contested designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128