DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002691410-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-12

000125916

Contested design: 002691410-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The previous Invalidity Division decision is set aside and replaced; the invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Entscheidung der Nichtigkeitsabteilung vom 29/08/2024 im vorliegenden Verfahren wird aufgehoben und durch die vorliegende Entscheidung ersetzt. 2. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 3. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 002691410-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 4. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

GMP Group Srlvia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Albano Sant'Alessandro, Italien

Represented by

Giulio Bonadio

Holder · RCD owner

Mercedes-Benz Group AG

Germany (DE)

Stuttgart, Deutschland

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCD⚠ rejected as evidence

earlier EU design relied on by the applicant

RCD No 002351247-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-02-16

Registered RCD⚠ rejected as evidence

earlier EU design relied on by the applicant

RCD No 002351247-0004 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-02-16

CatalogD1

wheel rim design shown in the Mercedes Benz accessories catalog

Mercedes Benz catalog 'Original Zubehör für die C-Klasse', Stand März 2014, page 45 · Mercedes Benz catalog · disclosed 2014-03-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 52(3)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on two earlier Mercedes-Benz RCDs and D1, a Mercedes-Benz accessories catalog dated March 2014.
  • Holder argued the two earlier RCDs were published only on 16 February 2015, the catalog publication date was unproven, the overall impression differed, and the action was barred by res judicata.
  • The Division rejected res judicata, excluded the two earlier RCDs from consideration, and held D1 had been disclosed by 31 March 2014 so it formed valid prior art outside the grace period.
  • Given broad design freedom for wheel rims, the shared five paired V-shaped spokes and overall rim structure created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128