DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015086452-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-15

000129506

Contested design: 015086452-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150864520001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Changzhou Canbo Travel Products Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Changzhou, Jiangsu, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Pin Chen

China (CN)

Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China

Represented by

Greg Robert Sach

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

car ramp for dogs

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 0CN CS7 NN1 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2023-11-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested dog car ramp lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier Amazon-listed four-panel ramp available since 15 November 2023.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure and found the compared ramps created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR and was therefore declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128