DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015062892-0018

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-21

000128075

Contested design: 015062892-0018

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015062892-0018 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Roman Omelchenkovia PDF extraction

UA

Odessa, Ukraine

Represented by

Olga Vahatova

Holder · RCD owner

Koptiev Stanislavvia PDF extraction

UA

Kherson, Ukraine

Represented by

Philipe Augusto da Silveira Cordeiro

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 6

Instagram screenshots showing a woman wearing a jumpsuit

Instagram account ivanasporti · disclosed 2023-01-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier Instagram disclosures of the same jumpsuit before the filing date.
  • The holder said the cited images showed different designs, were not reasonably known in the EU, and that the Article 7(2) grace period should be extended because of the war in Ukraine.
  • The Division held that the Instagram post in Annex 6 was a sufficient prior web disclosure, could reasonably have become known to the relevant EU trade circles, and fell outside the non-extendable grace period.
  • Comparing the disclosed prior jumpsuit with the contested design, the Division found the same overall impression on the informed user and concluded that the contested design lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028