DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015071649-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-29

000129365

Contested design: 015071649-0003

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015071649-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Chaline Liuvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Neuss, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Lin Zhou

China (CN)

Guangzhou, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for a black textured belt called 'CALIYO Gurtel'

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0D2D7BCN5 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2022-11-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier belt design disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure from 17 November 2022 under Article 7(1) EUDR.
  • Given broad design freedom for belts, the common buckle, texture, and lining features dominated; the underside mechanism difference did not change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b) EUDR, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028