DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002351247-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-05

000125857

Contested design: 002351247-0009

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered EU design No 002351247-0009 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragenes EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 002351247-0009 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jürgen Volkmervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Wachenheim, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Mercedes-Benz Group AG

Germany (DE)

Stuttgart, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

vehicle wheel rim model CVR102

CVR102; audiotech.fasmoto.com/2012/04/cvr-wheels-is-coming-to-town · Instagram account 'cvrwheels'; audiotech.fasmoto.com · disclosed 2012-04-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested wheel-rim design lacked novelty and individual character because earlier disclosures of model CVR102 created the same overall impression.
  • The holder denied effective disclosure, relied on Stuttgart court infringement rulings, and argued the wheel-design field was crowded so the cited differences preserved individual character.
  • The Division found D1 was validly disclosed online before the filing date and the holder did not rebut that presumption under Article 7(1).
  • It held designer freedom for vehicle rims was broad, market saturation was unproven, and the minor differences did not alter the overall impression for the informed user.
  • The application was upheld; the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128