DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015062685-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-18

000130085

Contested design: 015062685-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015062685-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Bingxiang Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Linyi City, Shandong Province, China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Jinyi E-Commerce Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Emilio Zeininger

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

scent diffuser offer on Amazon

ASIN B0CY428Z12 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2024-03-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and at least lack of individual character based on earlier public disclosure of a scent diffuser on Amazon before the filing date.
  • Holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure evidence under Article 7(1) and found the relevant product had been available since 15/03/2024.
  • Given the broad design freedom and the highly similar overall impressions, the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288