DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008607881-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-04

000129803

Contested design: 008607881-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 008607881-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yangyi Tianvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Chenzhou, Hu'nan, China

Holder · RCD owner

Meiban Chen

China (CN)

Quanzhou, Fujian, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Disposable safety body-, nose-, lip-, navel-, ear-piercing gun

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B07HXMDQN6 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-10-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested ear-piercing gun lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier Amazon-disclosed design available since 2 October 2018.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, designer freedom, or the comparison of overall impressions.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printouts as sufficient internet disclosure evidence under Article 7 and treated the prior design as publicly available before filing.
  • Given at least average designer freedom, the minor differences did not alter the very similar overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288