DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015056623-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-05

000130209

Contested design: 015056623-0003

EUDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015056623-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Madsaf Trade Service S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Năvodari, Tunari, Ilfov county, Romania

Represented by

Adina Silviana Timonea

Holder · RCD owner

Ecomsoul Pro SRL

Romania (RO)

Cristian, Jud Sibiu, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

hair curlers

EU design registration No 008482707-0001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2021-06-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested hair-curler design lacked novelty and individual character under Articles 4 to 6 EUDR in light of earlier EU design registration No 008482707-0001.
  • The holder was invited to file observations but did not reply and therefore left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division found the earlier design had been validly disclosed before the filing date through its publication in the EU Designs Bulletin.
  • Considering the informed user and the designer's broad to average freedom, the shared structure, proportions, interface layout, and silhouette created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288