DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008921340-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-10

000128638

Contested design: 008921340-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 008921340-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Muhuo Xievia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaoyan Kang

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

National designDesign 1

electric toothbrush

CN 305778026 S (application No 201930745373.5) · Chinese design patent publication · disclosed 2020-05-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over Design 1 of Chinese design patent CN 305778026 S for an electric toothbrush.
  • The holder argued the Chinese publication had not reasonably become known to specialised circles in the EU and, in any event, the contested design differed in handle shape, button placement, brush head position, and rear ridges.
  • The Division held publication in the Chinese design patent document on 12 May 2020 proved disclosure under Article 7(1) EUDR, and the holder had not rebutted that presumption.
  • Given at least average designer freedom for electric toothbrushes, the identified differences were minor and the contested design produced the same overall impression as the earlier design.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128157

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288