DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015087587-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-07

000128981

Contested design: 015087587-0008

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is granted, the registered EU design No 015087587-0008 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 015087587-0008 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mercedes-Benz Group AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stuttgart, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Robu Aktiengesellschaft

Switzerland (CH)

Appenzell, Schweiz

Represented by

Jochen Herrmann

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Mercedes-Maybach S-Class passenger car

https://media.mercedes-benz.com/en/press-kit/846ee20d-5879-4e01-82f3-391785dd36f0 · media.mercedes-benz.com · disclosed 2020-11-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on D1, a 19 November 2020 Mercedes-Maybach S-Class web disclosure, and also invoked prior MAYBACH rights.
  • Holder disputed disclosure of some earlier designs, argued the contested design created a different overall impression, and alternatively sought maintenance in amended form without the claimed logo and 'MAYBACH'.
  • The Division accepted D1 as publicly disclosed on 19 November 2020, found broad designer freedom for passenger cars, and treated the similarities in body shape, lighting, grille, lines, and two-tone finish as decisive.
  • Differences such as three versus five doors, glazing changes, and logo placements did not alter the overall impression; the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvo TSENKOV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128