DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 003366921-0017

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-02

000132086

Contested design: 003366921-0017

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected; the applicant bears the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 003366921-0017 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Commerce Avec La Chine Sarlvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Paris, France

Holder · RCD owner

Yanmin Chen

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Rhode Island Novelty aviator sunglasses

ASIN B002OXJ458, https://www.amazon.com · Amazon.com · disclosed 2009-08-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued lack of novelty: the contested sunglasses design (filed 06/09/2016) is identical to 'Rhode Island Novelty' aviator sunglasses disclosed on Amazon.com since 24/08/2009, differing only in the trade mark.
  • Holder did not submit observations.
  • The Division found that the designs differ in the colour of the frame, nose bridge and arms (golden in the prior design vs black in the contested design), a difference that is immediately perceptible and cannot be treated as immaterial under Article 5(2) EUDR; the single-view prior design also precluded full comparison of all features.
  • Application rejected as unfounded; no representation costs awarded as the holder had no professional representative.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132545

vs Dongguan Juying Intelligent Electronics Co.,Ltd

2026-07-02Art 25(1)(b)167
000128475

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-07-24Art 25(1)(b)167
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165