DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015121682-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-07-02

000132545

Contested design: 015121682-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected; the applicant bears the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 0151216820002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Reto Production Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Kowloon, Hong Kong

Holder · RCD owner

Dongguan Juying Intelligent Electronics Co.,Ltd

China (CN)

Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (3)

National design⚠ rejected as evidence

digital camera

2526450.2 · Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

digital camera design

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOZ3vDhCnoQ/ · Instagram

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

digital camera design

https://www.kodak.retopro.co · kodak.retopro.co

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested camera design lacks novelty and individual character over Hong Kong design registration No 2526450.2 (registered 10/10/2025) and disclosures on Instagram and the holder's website, claiming the overall impressions do not differ.
  • Holder did not submit observations and was undefended.
  • The Division rejected all evidence: the HK certificate's registration date was backdated to the filing date, not the publication date; the Instagram 'September 9' date lacked a year and was ambiguous; the website printout only showed a print date of 23/12/2025 (post-filing); and the internet images were not clearly identical to the HK registered design.
  • Application rejected as none of the evidence proved effective disclosure of a prior design before the contested design's filing date of 29/10/2025.

Deciding panel

  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberGailé SAKALAITÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132086

vs Yanmin Chen

2026-06-02Art 25(1)(b)167
000128475

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-07-24Art 25(1)(b)167
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)165