DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006384814-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-24

000110241

Contested design: 006384814-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006384814-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dongguan Leixiang Electronics Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

2th Floor, 3th Building, NO.9 Jinhe Road, Jinhe Community, Zhangmutou Town, 523628 Dongguan, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Süle Law Firm

Ákos Süle

Holder · RCD owner

Dongguan Shengming Industrial Co.,Ltd

China (CN)

Tiansheng Hu Cun Group, Luoma Road, Luoma Village, Qingxi Town, Dongguan, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Marinos Cleanthous

Prior art cited (2)

PatentPrior design 1

hot air comb

CN 304364620 S · Chinese patent document · disclosed 2017-11-21

Registered RCDPrior design 2

combs

RCD 6293932-0001 · Office Bulletin · disclosed 2019-03-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier RCD and a Chinese design patent, arguing the contested design shared all essential features.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not respond to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of both earlier designs and found the contested hair-styling apparatus produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the RCD was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000117753

vs Xinglong Mo

2022-08-04Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)289
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288