DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006948618-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-04

000117753

Contested design: 006948618-0005

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 006948618-0005 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Inter Group Spółka Cywilna Dawid Skiba & Eliza Trzmielvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. ks. Czesława Klimasa 41c lok. 11, 50-515 Wrocław, Poland

Represented by

Lawgical, S.L.P

Holder · RCD owner

Xinglong Mo

China (CN)

No. 511 Hegong Group, Hengping Village, Zhangshu Town, Hengyang County, Hengyang, Hunan, China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

nail polisher and nail files

RCD No 006443107-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-05-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity based on earlier RCD No 006443107-0001, alleging lack of novelty, lack of individual character, and conflict with an earlier design right.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD but found the contested design created a different overall impression because of its proportions, colours, and surface structure.
  • The Article 25(1)(d) claim also failed because the earlier design was disclosed before, not after, the contested design's filing date; the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000110241

vs Dongguan Shengming Industrial Co.,Ltd

2020-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)289
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)287
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)287
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)287
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)287
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)287
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)287
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)287