DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003773068-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-02

000109601

Contested design: 003773068-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 003773068-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Refan Bulgaria OODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

Karlovsko shose, 52, Trud, Bulgaria

Represented by

IP Consulting Ltd.

Holder · RCD owner

Fionna Cosmetics EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

7, Bulgaria Blvd., fl.7, app.7, 1408 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Pavlov & Co.

Vasil Pavlov Pavlov

Prior art cited (2)

Trade markTM1⚠ rejected as evidence

three-dimensional rose-blossom shape

Bulgarian three-dimensional trade mark registration No 78008

Trade markTM2

three-dimensional rose-blossom shape

Bulgarian three-dimensional trade mark registration No 86121 · Bulgarian Patent Office Official Bulletin

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity based mainly on lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier Bulgarian 3D trademarks and also invoked an earlier-sign ground.
  • The holder denied identity and individual-character objections, argued flower-shaped soaps were common, and challenged proof of the national-law basis for the earlier-sign claim.
  • The Division found no disclosure evidence for TM1 but accepted TM2 as disclosed, treated designer freedom for soap or candle shapes as virtually unlimited, and held both designs created the same overall impression of a rose.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4 and 6 CDR, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.0428.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127556

vs Gingko Design Ltd

2025-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)28, 2611
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268