DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008268130-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-04-28

000127556

Contested design: 008268130-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008268130-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guangzhou NO Line Creation Culture Dept Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 101, No.8, Aotou North Street, Gaotangshi, Kemulang, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Gingko Design Ltd.via PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit C23c, Holly Farm Business Park Honiley, Kenilworth, Warwickshire CV8 1NP, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

sleep fragrance lamp marketed as 'Wood Aromatherapy Heating Sleep Lamp'

https://detail.1688.com · 1688.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested lamp and diffuser design lacked novelty and individual character over designs disclosed online before the filing date.
  • It relied on extracts from 1688.com showing a similar sleep fragrance lamp first offered for sale in September 2020.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division found the prior design had been validly disclosed online and created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.0528.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000109601

vs FIONNA COSMETICS EOOD

2020-12-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)28, 2611
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268