DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008825897-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-12-14

000118240

Contested design: 008825897-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008825897-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Activeshop sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Graniczna 8B DC2A, 54-610 Wrocław, Poland

Represented by

Agnieszka Byra

Holder · RCD owner

Mollylac Michał Szewczykvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Piotrkowska 270, 90-361 Łódź, Poland

Represented by

Maria Przybylska-Karczemska

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

manicure drill shown in a product-review video

youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2019-01-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing that an earlier manicure drill disclosed on YouTube destroyed the contested design’s individual character.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant’s evidence of prior disclosure or the claimed similarity between the designs.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube screenshot as prior disclosure, found broad design freedom, and held that minor graphic, colour and unseen-part differences did not change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character; the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.0228.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000102239

vs iLogoTech GmbH

2018-12-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)13, 2811
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138