DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015027794-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-01-21

000126495

Contested design: 015027794-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015027794-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Bo Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.48, Shunli, Shuangqiao Street, Dinghai District, Zhoushan City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Chunhui Jingvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Jingjiatun, Tantun village, Helong Town, Nong'an County, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Facebook post showing a tow hitch for bikes under the name "Tire-Velo / tow bike"

https://www.facebook.com · Facebook · disclosed 2020-11-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over an earlier tow hitch for bikes disclosed on Facebook in 2020.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut disclosure or the applicant’s comparison of the designs.
  • The Division found the Facebook post sufficiently proved disclosure and considered the informed user to perceive the same overall impression from the key design features.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Articles 25(1)(b), 4(1) and 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128